📢 Important Update — New Official Contact Information

Dear friends and followers,

Due to copyright reports and some issues affecting our previous contact channels, we’ve officially moved to new accounts to ensure smooth and reliable communication with everyone.

Please update your records and contact us only through the new official links below:

old site : crack-westernpips.com

old telegram id : @drm**avi2 this one taken by scammer don’t send msg to that and report this one

We appreciate your understanding and continued support.
If you’ve recently tried reaching out through our old Telegram or site and didn’t get a response, please contact us again via the new address above.

Thank you for staying connected with us — we’re back, stronger and more secure than before. 💪

—Ahmad musavi

HFT , ML , TimesFM, Prophet


⚙️ 1. What “market microstructure” actually means for ML

Microstructure data = the lowest level of trading information:

  • Order book snapshots (bid/ask depth)
  • Order flow (limit, market, cancel orders)
  • Trade volumes, timestamps (microsecond–millisecond)
  • Imbalances, spread dynamics, queue position, etc.

In high-frequency trading (HFT), your “edge” comes from reacting to these microsecond-level dynamics faster and smarter than competitors.

So the challenge isn’t just prediction — it’s prediction under latency + noise + regime change.


🧠 2. Should You Use ML for HFT?

Short answer:
✅ Yes — ML can help with pattern detection, classification, microstructure understanding,
❌ But not every ML method fits real HFT constraints (latency, stability, slippage).

You don’t want a 100-million-parameter Transformer doing inference while your competitor executes in 200 µs.

So: Use ML carefully, focusing on fast, robust, interpretable models.


🔬 3. ML Models That Actually Work in Market Microstructure

Here’s what top proprietary firms and academic papers use effectively:

RankModelWhy It Works
🥇 Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN)Captures short-term temporal dependencies; faster than LSTMs; can process dense tick data.Predict short-term price direction / order imbalance
🥈 LSTM / GRU (lightweight)Sequential pattern modeling; works well if trained on event-based data.Predict next-tick price move, trade volume, spread change
🥉 1D CNNs on limit order book snapshotsCaptures spatial structure (price levels × depth). Simple, fast.Predict mid-price movement (↑/↓/→)
4️⃣ Graph Neural Networks (GNN)Model relationships between different order levels / instruments.Cross-asset microstructure dependencies
5️⃣ Reinforcement Learning (RL)Learns execution strategy rather than price direction.Optimal order placement, market-making, latency arbitrage
6️⃣ Hybrid (CNN + LSTM + Attention)Combines spatial + temporal + selective focus.Multi-asset HFT systems or deep limit order book prediction

⚡ 4. Best-Performing Architectures in Research / Practice

A few concrete examples (from real HFT/LOB papers):

ModelDatasetResult
DeepLOB (Zhang et al., 2018)LOBSTER datasetCNN+LSTM+Inception blocks, great for short-term mid-price movement prediction.
DeepLOB-ATTN (2021)Extended DeepLOB with attentionImproved interpretability and stability.
TCN-LOB (2020)Temporal convolutional model for order bookFaster inference, comparable accuracy.
RL-Execution (2019–2023)Simulated microstructureRL agent optimizing trade execution cost; used by market-making desks.

🧩 5. Hybrid Real-World Approach

A practical high-frequency ML stack often looks like this:

(1) Feature Extraction Layer

Convert LOB/tick data to engineered features:

  • Order imbalance = (BidVol – AskVol) / (BidVol + AskVol)
  • Spread, depth ratio, queue imbalance, cancel/submit rate
  • Micro price, volatility burst detection

(2) Fast Prediction Model

  • Small CNN or TCN (< 10 ms inference)
  • Predict P(next_mid_price_up) or Δprice in next 100 ms
  • Quantize / compile model to run on CPU/GPU/FPGA

(3) Execution Logic

  • If model’s confidence > threshold → send order
  • Integrate with risk & latency control layer

(4) Online Retraining

  • Update model every few minutes/hours with rolling data
  • Discard stale weights (non-stationary behavior)

🚫 6. When to Ignore ML

You should ignore or limit ML if:

  • You’re doing ultra-low latency arbitrage (< 10 µs) → hardware logic (FPGA, C++) is king
  • Your data is too noisy / low quality
  • You can exploit simple statistical patterns (queue imbalance, VWAP drift) faster with plain math

In these cases, rule-based or linear models outperform deep ones simply because they’re faster and easier to maintain.


🧩 7. Realistic Takeaway

SituationRecommended Approach
You have millisecond data and want to detect order flow pressure→ Use CNN/TCN (e.g., DeepLOB-like)
You want to optimize execution strategy (not direction)→ Use Reinforcement Learning (PPO/DDPG)
You’re competing in ultra-HFT (microsecond)→ Skip ML; use FPGA + hard-coded logic
You’re doing short-term trading (seconds to minutes)→ Hybrid: ML signal + rule-based execution

🧠 Summary

  • ML is powerful, but not magic for HFT.
  • Best models: TCN, DeepLOB, small LSTM/CNN hybrids.
  • Avoid heavy models (Transformers, TimesFM) unless for macro or regime tasks.
  • In HFT, speed, stability, and risk management matter more than squeezing an extra 1% accuracy.

HFT paper

“Now we were sending out orders before the data packet arrived.”
Korean trading. Fun and games with Japanese infrastructure. The Toronto – New Jersey interlisted arb. How not to negotiate multi-million dollar deals. Reverse engineering the ASX. Building the world’s fastest (at the time) network switch and matching engine. Killing canaries. The ATS that wasn’t. Lots of reading fun to be had by all.


I started my HFT career at one of the larger American trading firms as a C++ jockey. On my first day, I was greeted by full panes of glass boasting glorious Sydney Harbour views which were modestly obscured by a hand-scrawled “< 2ms” on that glass. This was the main goal for the dozen of us in IT. That wasn’t my remit at the start though. First things first…

Continue reading HFT paper